I was not aware of the BRIT school and enjoyed findin This would probably have been more interesting to me had I not been such a big fan and read up on her life in other ways. I was not aware of the BRIT school and enjoyed finding out about the various names who have been educated there. Feb 19, Lauren Camella rated it it was amazing.
I love this book!! If you want to read a good, well written book about Adele, then this is the book to read! This biography talks about Adele and her childhood to where she is now! Adele is making great history, and if you are a huge fan lie me, you will definitely like it!!! Great BOOK!!! I loved how he really explained every detail and HOW he put the information into the different chapters. Mar 27, Parker Vanwaardhuizen rated it did not like it.
- Adele: The Biography (Updated Edition)?
- Adele Biography | Singer.
- Adele Childhood Biography, life Story & Net worth;
- Adele Biography, Facts & Life Story?
This book is about adele's start to finish. It explains her hard times and he best times to her favorite place to go and live. The theme is more or less like try your best to notice your talent. The book starts out with adele trying to figure out what she wants to do and it goes on to like where she ended up. What awards she ends up getting. Adele she is a kind fun very talented very unique person i have probably read about. She has some crazy style. She is a very soulful singer also as well as a This book is about adele's start to finish.
She is a very soulful singer also as well as a experience writer to. Some parts were kind of interesting but i really didn't find the whole book in general like great and stood out from others. It wasn't the most it was a biography so there weren't parts that you really looked forward to or cliff hangers or stuff like that. The larger issue in this is she was able to be blessed with a talent and also was able to use that to create something great. Sometimes in america today people have a rough time figuring out what the want to do in life and do it good for a good cause.
Some of this was interesting such as when she grew up in London, her experiences in the BRIT school and the photos showing her success. For me I usually read autobiographies, and I haven't really read a lot of those. It seems that autobiographies seem much more personal and make a lot more sense. Reading a biography is someone saying this happened and this is how she felt about it.
It wasn't gripping and all the waffley sentences describing what happened were honestly very boring. The last chapt Some of this was interesting such as when she grew up in London, her experiences in the BRIT school and the photos showing her success. The last chapter about Adele's main things such as about her weight, her friends and her awards were great. And Adele's personality were very much seen through those few sentences. Overall this book and biographies aren't for me just yet. Jan 09, Elizabeth rated it really liked it. Got this book as a Christmas gift.
I wasn't keen on reading it as the internet provides almost all information these days.
I love the candid interactions Adele has with the author, her stories from BRIT and lots of other things, giving a good insight into this awesome personality. It's not a story of struggle or resilience like you would expect in most biographies but its a nice read giving some perspective to Got this book as a Christmas gift. It's not a story of struggle or resilience like you would expect in most biographies but its a nice read giving some perspective to one of the greatest female artists of our times.
Adele The Biography Just as the title suggest it's all about the young singer whose career has been remarkably. It is very well written, and through it you could feel Adele voice singing or when she was sitting getting interviewed,I am a new to Adele voice she sings with a lot of passion. She has a lovely voice. Here to next album which is her 4 th one. Feb 19, Dana rated it it was amazing.
Una din cele mai relaxante si motivationale carti. Dupa ce am terminat cartea , am realizat ca in spatele unui succes colosal sta o persoana minunata ce ar trebui sa fie un model pentru noi toti.
Pentru mine este mai mult decat un model. Este o foarte mica parte din sufletul meu. Nov 06, Mia Sebti added it. Her father, Mark Evans left her family when she was just four years old with her year-old mother, Penny Adkins. Adele attended the performing arts BRIT school where she once submitted an album for a project. As soon as these producers discovered Adele, they had her signed to a label only four months after she graduated school. Today, Adele has won over 10 Grammy awards and 3 Guinness world records. Although she has been singing on stage in front of millions of people for many years, she has admitted to having stage fright.
She says that she sometimes has panic attacks before her performances and sometimes even vomits backstage. In , Adele had to have a throat surgery because of her bad smoking habits and stopped singing for a year after that. For a year, there were no new songs or albums but after her recovery, she made one of the biggest comebacks anyone had seen in a long time. Today, all of her new releases are number 1 on all billboards. Adele has a lot of success because unlike most pop stars today, she has a fan base that varies of all group ages.
A lot of people wonder why all of her albums names are numbers,but there is a simple explanation to that. As of , Adele has 6 albums and is planning on many more to come. I chose to read this book because I realized that very few people actually knew the story behind thing amazing singer.
Before reading this book, I mainly wanted to know how Adele was discovered and how was her life while growing up. A lot of people might disagree but I'm my opinion Adele is a hero to a lot of people. Adele is known to shut down body shamers and encourage people to love themselves just the way they are.
She even said that her goal in life is to never be skinny because she believes that music is through the ears and not the eyes. Today, Adele is one of the biggest singers in the world, very few people does not know who she is. Most of her fans love her for her music and her beautiful voice.
Reading this book taught me a lot if interesting facts about her and made me realize that there is much more to her than her voice. Most of the people that listen to her including me, know her but not her story. I recommend this book to anyone who is interested in learning more about her life and story. Personally, my favorite part of the book is when the author described how excited she was when the producers wanted to sign her, because, without those two producers, Adele would have probably never have gotten famous.
However, my least favorite part of the book, was when Adele got sick because of her smoking addiction and had to get throat surgery. The readers can tell that Adele was really devastated that she had to give up her singing career for a whole year. Sep 13, Hanka rated it it was ok. May 04, Brina rated it it was amazing. Dies finde ich allerdings richtig gut, denn Adele hat in Interviews immer betont, dass die Musik bei ihr im Vordergrund steht. Chas Newkey-Burden beschreibt die Arbeit von "19" und "21" sehr intensiv und emotional.
Die Fotos sehen allesamt sehr hochwertig aus und zeigen Adele in den verschiedensten Momenten. So kann man sie u. Hoffentlich wird sie die Menschen weiterhin mit ihren melancholischen Songs bereichern und eine lange Karriere vor sich haben. View all 4 comments. Just a quick read. I really like Adele but I found it quite boring. I'm also quite pissed off to find out she hurt Phil Collins' feelings.
He's one of my favourite artists. But oh well. It was quite fun to read how she came to write some songs but they didn't really go into it that much. The book was mostly about the awards she won and what critics had to say about her. Feb 15, Paula Monteiro rated it liked it. Good and real, like Adele. Adele is my favourite artist. Her songs are amazing and she seems to be a wonderful person. So I couldn't wait to get my hands on this biography.
However, it turned out to be one big disappointment. I hated the writing style, although that might also be due to the way it was translated I read a Dutch edition. There were several grammatically incorrect sentences and a lot of quotes from interviews seemed to be just copy-pasted after each other. Also, a lot of elements were repeated throughout th Adele is my favourite artist. Also, a lot of elements were repeated throughout the book. The book also promised the story on her latest album Yeah right.
It only mentions that it is coming up apparently the album wasn't even published yet when they were writing this. So, nothing on her new songs or the stories behind it.. Also, I could tell that the author had written several other biographies, because he kept talking about Amy Winehouse and Justin Bieber - artists about which he has written as well. So Bob Taylor, over in the Computer Science Lab—we were in the Systems Science Lab, in a different lab—he wanted to run a big workshop, a multi-day workshop, for the President of Xerox and nine other people. So there I was, asked by Alan to put together all of the software courseware and run the Lab, and I had just had a baby!
But the computers of those times were Altos, and I think I got the first one at home. We considered it the heater for the winter! One of my favorite nights was when Rachel was crying, crying—maybe she had a stomach ache or whatever—and I was trying to work with some people, and we only had nine weeks to put everything together, so it was a fairly tense time. I found it very supportive. Just little things like that were very nice. So when things got a little more sour and became more of a zero-sum game, it was kind of too bad, because it had started out really nice.
There were a lot of things that went on there that gave Xerox good payback. After each speaker they had somebody who commented on what they said—this was the way the history conference did it, so all of those were there for history purposes—and I wrote that. Smalltalk was the name given to the software for this personal computer—this hand-held, carry-it-with-you, have-a-network, talk-with-other-people, exchange-ideas, build-models.
The basic idea was that anyone who wanted to could learn to construct and deconstruct models to understand with, so the language had to be a simulation language. The primary implementer in those days was—well, still is—Dan Ingalls, who is just a wonderful person. Then the Alto was built in cooperation with the Computer Science Lab, and Smalltalk 72 was put up on there. Smalltalk 72 was an extremely odd language.
So it would look ahead and see if it wanted the next token, and if it wanted, it might eat it up; and so depending on the implementation of a method, the object was gobbling up the message stream! So you had to follow the entire thing from the beginning to see what the meaning of each line was? Oh, yes. Yes, it was very strange. So for very simple things—very, very simple things that were being mirrored, which was the LOGO turtle geometry capability—there was a little picture of a face, which was Myrtle the Turtle; and you could tell Myrtle to go a hundred, and it would go a hundred.
In APL, at least, you actually can parse it without knowing the implementation. Here, you had to know the implementation. We were looking at a variety of uses of the Dynabook as a dynamic medium: what does it really mean to capture information and be able to make it accessible for manipulation? And the notion that you, as an average person, could express how to manipulate it is even more powerful—and, given that it was , pretty unusual.
So the research program was always: do a language, do its implementation, create uses, try it out. We had a target set of media-based applications we were interested in—document editors, and various simulations, and music, and art, and how they would interact—and so we would build these. That was the idea. So we took that as a given, as to how we would devise a course of study. The team was investigating implementations. What would you teach them, to have them have a way to think about searching and finding?
So it was very driven, not so much by the academics of computer science as by the notion of who the target users were going to be. They were not professional computer scientists. Smalltalk 76, then, had a class structure with a hierarchy. And you wanted to be able to replay, to recapture work potentially lost due to a crash. Bravo, the early text editor that was done in the Computer Science Lab, because it was under development, would keep a complete incremental track of exactly what the user did; so if you lost something, you could always replay it.
This turned out to be the major aspect of the text editor that made it, in its early days, a tool, not just a research project. So we kind of did the same thing, mirroring it in the memory manager for Smalltalk; and that was very interesting. The way it was designed was as a discrete-event—driven simulation world. The implementation was general purpose, based on a Simula system called Demos.
We specifically had five or six simulated contexts that the participants would work in. So you had things that were about the business, so that the workshop participants could be interested; and it was very visual, so you could see the queue for workers, and see the work get done, and collect data on it and stuff; and they were going to build these things. It turned out the best way to do that, of course, was to have a framework for simulation that was specializable: there were components provided, but those components were only starting points.
- Adele: The Biography;
- Children in the Way: Creative opportunities for churches with young children;
- Adele Relationship;
So that was a big push on sub-classing. So I suggested we do the following: that Ted come up with a scheme he wanted to do; Dave check it out; and if he approved, implement it. It had to work. We were really having a good time. We had color output; we were using the color printer; we had music playing. We were just getting a little carried away, having a good old time—which was making Bob Taylor very nervous!
He was livid! We had no idea; no one told us. It was really amazing! The Open University in the UK was doing a new first course in computer science, and for a variety of reasons we agreed they would use this kind of experimental LearningWorks system—version 0. I remember when we went to England to get the bug list, figuring we had a long list to deal with; and the bugs were all in their curriculum, not in our system. There were obviously things we could have done to improve it, but it was basically good enough.
There are a lot of systems like that out today, where people really understand the layering and the incremental development, but Smalltalk was pretty early in that. Smalltalk 78 was an implementation on a machine that we worked on with another group to design, called the NoteTaker—which was a luggable, not a portable; about suitcase size. We had it done about the same timeframe that Osborne had his luggable, but Osborne mispositioned in the market and messed up his business.
We never got to build the refinement; we just had several prototypes. We had spent a lot of time with East Coast Xerox groups; we were really starting to work with the divisions and find out who was interested in our ideas, who could benefit; and we went after the guys who managed the technical documents, thinking the technicians really had a problem with getting hands-on information. They could carry this around, take it right in the office. This way they can carry it in; it would all be there, and they can download up-to-date stuff every night. It was a project I worked on with Larry Tesler.
Did it not exist? I had been much more involved than other team members because of my experience with SIGCUE in ACM, in the professional society, and knew a bit more about publication opportunities. I took a liking to the idea that before you build a system, you document it; so we decided that really what we needed to do was to rewrite the Smalltalk system, knowing we were going to share results broadly, and write a book about something cleaner that could be distributed.
I went through a process with my manager, who was Bert Sutherland at the time, that we wanted to do this; and he was so wonderful. We got Xerox to agree that nobody in the company was interested in Smalltalk [laughs]—that way, we knew if we did the work we could publish it. So over the next several years—what was planned as a year project took three years—we ended up coming up with three books, and a system that was distributed under license to universities and some commercial organizations. But this system now changed its goal a bit, because up to this point, it was a very loose system in which we were experimenting with what you could teach kids.
Do what you want! What would you like to do? But here, they had a way of doing it and did a lot of really interesting stuff. In fact, a couple of the kids we hired actually wrote papers for one of the personal computing magazines. One was a girl, one was a boy. As young adults, he went off to Apple and did the first Mac Finder.
She taught some of our classes. You know, we really let the kids take responsibility, if they wanted. There are a lot of papers on all this. But this project was full-out, full-time, because we were driving it from writing a book and creating something that was going to be distributed—and distributed to software engineers.
Our goal was to teach hardware designers and their software counterparts what we thought might be the need for something special in the hardware.
School , Singing, Signed
It turned out we were wrong. I wanted to know what everyone else was doing, whether our stuff would run on anything else. I think that when we finished the books and got everything out, a couple of things were true. You know, you start a business, you plan a certain success. We were communicating.
So that was very interesting. Very sharp people, down in Pasadena. I was Lab Manager by then and should have been told, and found out after the fact that XSIS had committed to doing a big, new approach to workstations for analysts, using our research system. This is a research result. So he showed me the code, and it was a mess! They built wonderful systems that they used for years, and there was really no good commercial competition for it.
But it was because of them—and their community of subcontractors, all of whom they demanded learn object technology and use this stuff—that there really was a commercial need for support. I had suggested to Xerox that they might want a business unit or something like that. So I think I ended up in business without thinking through the impact on me personally; what it really meant. We were selling licenses for this published thing.
Nobody in those days did hundred-million-dollar software companies. That was a big surprise, too! We ended up writing a proposal: Xerox had an Innovation Board that we went to and presented the option, and they said, Well, there was no place in the company, and if we wanted to spin it out separately, we could.
It took a long time to negotiate an exit, but we were the first group to spin out a separate, venture-backed company out of Xerox. That was ParcPlace Systems. What would I have done differently? I learned over the years to bring in a lot more—for each position, to bring in very experienced people. Learning on the job costs you a lot of time.
If the stuff was public, we could have gone out and started something on our own. I liked the idea of partnering with Xerox; I like the idea they made money; but I think it cost us too much in lost time. They ended up with a totally different approach to starting companies that Bob Adams manages. I thought I was doing the right thing globally, but it was the wrong thing locally.
That was one problem. The second: I had no business experience. Of course you could have. So I hired somebody, and I hired very badly. He took the company public. We had a good IPO, it went up, and then pow! It went bad, pretty much because of his bad business relations and decisions. So I learned a lot. I probably just learned a lot about team formation.
I did a project afterwards to understand more about distributed teams and how to help them work together. I mean, would you ever really want to be a teenager again? Was ParcPlace doing licensing and support for Smalltalk, or were you developing applications with it? We were doing Smalltalk, primarily.
Had I had more experience, and more credibility in the business world, I could have talked them out of that big-time mistake; but it was an obligation of the funding. We invented the Smalltalk community. We were kind of the core of it. There were all these wonderful companies around us, and there were competitors, and all of that made for a great market: a lot of competition, and a lot of choices for customers, which they liked; they liked setting companies against each other. It was wonderful. We knew all the people; we knew everything. The world headed that way eventually, but we were just really too early for those people.
We were fine with people who were COBOL people; people who were into more visual languages; who were interested more in simulation. So that was just a big-time mistake, and it created a lot of mixed messages to our customers, and mixed messages to our engineers.
It was very problematic. So there are at least a couple things I would have done differently. Very, very unpleasant, the last few years. Not fun at all. I just watched the most remarkable, terrible behavior; greedy behavior. I would just as soon never have had that experience. I mean, are you going into computer science for research? Is this science? Is this academic? Or is this about setting yourselves up so you can start companies and go after money? Who did it? Some people do. And they get a little confused about the ordering of results.
We did an enormous amount of these things that people have done patents in more recently! But that push, that business: It changes the tone, enormously. Not always bad! So the research culture has changed a lot. Now, that always happens; you make a discovery and then it becomes everyday. I mean, a theoretician doing theoretical computer science: do they do theoretical computer science, or do they do applied math? Forget it! I even wonder why the men are doing it, to tell you the truth. What I liked about ParcPlace was that there were so many different customers in different industries, and I could learn all about the different businesses, and that was really a gift.
This is another way to do that. I had been on the Board of a company that did CD-ROM—based college supplementary materials, and we were moving it on to the Internet when they ran out of money. Dana Center at the University of Texas, Austin, which is a phenomenal group of people in educational policy and professional development. Part of the foundation grant obligation is to teach fifty classes of calculus and fifty classes of statistics.
I learned that a long time ago! The satisfaction comes from being part of a really creative group of people who not only invented an idea, but made it real enough that other people could take advantage of that idea in a way that was enormously empowering. And what they did was not predictable.
So the domain experts—our customers—taught us; and that feedback loop, which allowed us to improve our systems and then that helped them, was just a wonderful way to evolve your business, involve your thinking, your life. Was there anything specific when you were President of the ACM that you accomplished, or were trying to accomplish?
Depending on the President or depending on the decade, the staff is either given loose reins or tight reins. I came in specifically at a time in the mid-eighties when, like now, the economy was down. We needed to tighten up and tighten up a lot and, for some reason, I knew how to do that. The first was Jean Sammet, and Jean ended up in the same situation where there was a belt-tightening time, which is kind of funny.
What did we do during that time? One of the issues at hand was that ACM was too much of a secret. In Europe it was much more respected, but in the United States still a secret, and we wanted to have a lot more visibility. I started the History of Computing Series, where we did about five conferences, and the very first one was the History of Personal Workstations, and so I edited the book, sort of setting the tone for what would happen in the subsequent books.
There was a time of enormous turmoil, in the eighties, about the good and the bad about computing. I did decide that I had to tighten up staff and get it reorganized a bit, and I think we did a good job of that, and holding forth on not losing our shirt. Everyone agreed that those would be the criteria, but no one at the table believed it would happen, except ACM. All three happened! With the National Computer Conference, the writing was on the wall as well.
Specialized conferences were more likely to be successful, rather than these big umbrella ones for which you had very few choices of locations, and you ended up in the heat [laughs]—the heat of Houston or wherever!
Adele facts for kids
The guys in my lab started one. I thought they were great! For some of it, it was just a lot of work to deal with the financial situation and to know what the right thing was to do. We ended up changing Executive Directors, but that had been planned for some time. You know, we tried to do tutorial stuff together, which was a failure. ACM core was putting out a lot of money for very-long-standing projects that never were having proper reviews, and we came up with the idea of just stopping funding them and letting them apply—in an NSF grant application sort of style—to the SIG Board, because the SIGs would provide funding.
So we changed the financing structure and the review structure for some of these projects. That included a wonderful education project, which was a set of slides and instructions for people to go to school and explain about computer science; career counseling stuff. So we changed the tone of financial decision making a bit. Yes, it was; but again, my mission was simply cleaning up the finances, not doing all those other things. And my mission was to stop being Editor-in-Chief of Computing Surveys, which was a lot of work! My second piece of advice is: knowing about computers, and knowing about math, is just a basic skill these days, so you need to learn something about both.
So their parents need to help encourage them and make math and computing be fun. Bob was always drawing, and he told me if you really want to learn to draw, every picture you start, you have to finish. For me, every project you start and every course you take, you finish it. But you do have to finish it! I have two daughters. Dennis has two, so I have two stepdaughters.
And then my younger daughter just finished her second year in graduate school. Peter H. Alan Kay.
a book review by Amanda Mark: Adele: The Biography (Updated Edition)
Thomas J. Bergin and Richard G. Adele Goldberg, ed. A History of Personal Workstations. Oral-History:Adele Goldberg. Copyright Statement This manuscript is being made available for research purposes only. I always start at the beginning, so can you tell me when you were born and where you grew up? Abbate: What did your parents do for a living? Goldberg: My father was what would be considered an industrial engineer; he ran production for various companies. Abbate: That sounds like a handful! Abbate: So both your parents had kind of technical backgrounds? Goldberg: Not really. Abbate: Really?
Goldberg: Yes. Abbate: Were you interested in math or science from an early age? Goldberg: Absolutely! Goldberg: Illinois Institute of Technology. Abbate: Okay. Did your sisters like math, too, or just you? Goldberg: Just me! Abbate: You went to just a regular public school? Goldberg: I went to regular public schools. Abbate: Did your parents encourage you to have a career? Were you expected to be supporting yourself? Goldberg: For me it was an enormous change.
Abbate: At Michigan, did you major in math? Goldberg: I majored in math, and they had some computer classes. Abbate: This was within a math class that you were using the computer? Goldberg: No, they had computer classes. Abbate: Had you asked IBM about being in the training program? Goldberg: No, I just knew because I had worked there. Goldberg: No! Abbate: Those were people from Bell Labs? Were you living with your parents? Goldberg: No. Abbate: So you had already decided you were interested in computers in education? Goldberg: Not exactly.
What was the topic? Goldberg: It was actually handed to me. Abbate: What was that called? Abbate: I mean the system. Did it have a name? Abbate: What if what they did was wrong? Abbate: How did you end up in Brazil? Goldberg: Yes, that was fun! Abbate: Where did you meet your husband? Goldberg: At Stanford. He was a student in the department as well. Abbate: And that was computer science?
Goldberg: No, it was interdisciplinary, with students from education and math and psychology and computing at the Institute for Mathematical Studies. Goldberg: How did I get the job at Xerox? Good luck! I was really lucky. Developing Smalltalk Abbate: Tell me about Smalltalk. Goldberg: Okay. So: what do you want to know?
Abbate: What were you doing? What was your experience? Goldberg: Smalltalk was the name given to the software for this personal computer—this hand-held, carry-it-with-you, have-a-network, talk-with-other-people, exchange-ideas, build-models. Abbate: So you had to follow the entire thing from the beginning to see what the meaning of each line was?
Goldberg: Oh, yes. Abbate: And that was ParcPlace? Goldberg: That was ParcPlace Systems. Abbate: What would. Goldberg: What would I have done differently? Abbate: Was ParcPlace doing licensing and support for Smalltalk, or were you developing applications with it? Goldberg: We were doing Smalltalk, primarily. Abbate: Hmm. Abbate: Do they think it started with Java or something? Goldberg: Some people do. Abbate: Now, is that because things have already been done in computer science? Goldberg: That was what I thought I was doing, was going and getting vocational training! Consulting: Neometron Abbate: I guess we should talk about your current business, Neometron.